Index #1 · rank 43 of 47 · SaaS · scanned 2026-07-19
Linear
Agent readability of https://developers.linear.app/docs — scored from a reproducible crawl snapshot under rubric v0.
Deterministic · 40%
59
LLM rubric · 35%
25
Task probes · 25%
100
Band
amber
Machine-checkable fundamentals
✕llms.txt at the rootllms.txt present · 0 sections · 1 links51%
✕OpenAPI spec discoverable & validOpenAPI found (https://linear.app/developers) but did not validate40%
✓Heading structuremean heading-quality 100% over 33 pages100%
✕Code samples on reference pagesno reference pages identified0%
✕Auth documented with an exampleauthentication mentioned but no code example on the auth page50%
✓Pages within agent token budget33/33 pages within 8000-token budget100%
✓Links resolve0/1518 links broken100%
✓Crawler & meta hygienemean meta-hygiene 100% over 33 pages100%
Can an agent actually finish?
✓Find the authentication methodnamed an auth method with a cited sourcePASS
✓Find the rate limitsstated a concrete rate limit with a cited sourcePASS
✓Construct a first valid requestproduced a request construct with a cited sourcePASS
Executed by a pinned claude-sonnet-5 agent over the crawl snapshot; graded on substance + citation, transcripts stored.
Prose quality, graded by model
Clarity
1/4
Completeness
0.2/4
Consistency
1.8/4
Key pages assessed
6
Is this your documentation? Every score is reproducible from stored inputs, and corrections are part of the methodology — if a page we couldn't reach is reachable to a normal agent, we'll re-scan and publish the update. See the methodology or grab your badge.