Index #1 · rank 46 of 47 · AI · scanned 2026-07-19
OpenAI
Agent readability of https://platform.openai.com/docs — scored from a reproducible crawl snapshot under rubric v0.
‡ Partial lift. Scores somewhat higher under JavaScript rendering; the fetch-only score stands as the Index value.
Deterministic · 40%
66
LLM rubric · 35%
21
Task probes · 25%
67
Band
amber
Machine-checkable fundamentals
✕llms.txt at the rootno llms.txt found at the site root0%
✕OpenAPI spec discoverable & validOpenAPI found (https://platform.openai.com/openapi.json) but did not validate40%
✓Heading structuremean heading-quality 75% over 2 pages75%
✓Code samples on reference pages1/1 reference pages have code samples100%
✓Auth documented with an exampleauthentication documented with a code example100%
✓Pages within agent token budget2/2 pages within 8000-token budget100%
✓Links resolve0/493 links broken100%
✓Crawler & meta hygienemean meta-hygiene 65% over 2 pages65%
Can an agent actually finish?
✓Find the authentication methodnamed an auth method with a cited sourcePASS
✕Find the rate limitsanswer states no concrete numeric rate limitFAIL
✓Construct a first valid requestproduced a request construct with a cited sourcePASS
Executed by a pinned claude-sonnet-5 agent over the crawl snapshot; graded on substance + citation, transcripts stored.
Prose quality, graded by model
Clarity
1/4
Completeness
0.5/4
Consistency
1/4
Key pages assessed
2
Is this your documentation? Every score is reproducible from stored inputs, and corrections are part of the methodology — if a page we couldn't reach is reachable to a normal agent, we'll re-scan and publish the update. See the methodology or grab your badge.